RevOps byTom Schoorstra.
All expertise

HubSpot pipeline reviews

I review pipeline structure and deal data so stages reflect the real process and handovers are easier to follow.

I consolidated several HubSpot pipelines into one process from MQL to Closed Won, so the team could follow progress and handovers in one place. See the pipeline consolidation case.

What I review

The starting point is how the team works today and where deals stop moving. A review covers:

  • Stages and exit criteria: what each stage means and what must happen before a deal moves on.
  • Field use: required deal properties per stage, and the gaps that make the next step unclear.
  • Configuration: the proposed structure, migration of existing deals and any dependent automation.
  • Reporting: pipeline health and conversion views, with the assumptions behind any revenue forecast made explicit.

Rollout and monitoring

I work through the stage definitions with the team, then test the new structure and field requirements before rollout. The handover includes process guidelines and reporting definitions.

After rollout, I check how stages and required fields are used. A process change or a growing queue of stuck deals is a reason to review the setup.

Scope and platform

The approach can apply to deal or ticket pipelines. Available rules, automation and reporting depend on the HubSpot subscription and object type.

I define scope, permissions and migration responsibility before changing live records. Better stage definitions support reporting; forecasts still depend on the underlying data and assumptions.

More about my approach

Questions about this area of HubSpot? Get in touch.